Affiliated with RCfalse
Comparison of the offline and the online bias correction of the WRF-EURAD in Porto, Portugal
Hoi, K.I.1; Yuen, K.V.1; Mok, K.M.1; Miranda, A.I.2; Ribeiro, I.2
Conference NameInternational Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs)
Source Publication8th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software
Conference Date13 July 2016
Conference PlaceToulouse, France

This study compared two types of (offline vs. online) bias correction models applied to correct the mismatch between the predicted daily averaged PM10 concentration by the deterministic air quality forecasting system WRF-EURAD and the measured concentration at the air quality monitoring station in Porto, Portugal. The WRF-EURAD is a Eulerian system consisting of a Weather Research Forecasting (WRF) model and a European Air Pollution Dispersion (EURAD) model. Both bias correction models were linear statistical models developed with the same set of input variables. The major difference between the online or the offline models is the adaptiveness. While the coefficients of the offline bias correction model are fixed after training with the ordinary least squares, those in the online bias correction model are updated adaptively with the Kalman filter. Comparison of these bias correction models was made at an urban traffic station Senhora da Hora in Porto, Portugal within 2013. The fractional bias of the daily PM10 forecast by the WRF-EURAD was found significantly improved from -38% to 7% and 3% after the correction by the offline or the online bias correction model, respectively. In addition, further comparison of the overall performance indicators (root-mean-squared error and correlation coefficient) and the indicators focusing on the days of the PM10 episodes (episode detection rate, false alarm rate, and critical success index) revealed that the online correction model could lead to more improvement of the WRF-EURAD compared to the offline model. By comparing the temporal variation of each estimated model coefficient and the 95% confidence interval between both correction models, the model coefficient corresponding to the raw forecast of the WRFEURAD in the online model has varied significantly in the second half of the year. It was concluded that the air quality system in Porto may be time-varying and further investigation is necessary to find out the leading cause.

KeywordBias Correction Kalman Filter Pm10 Portugal Wrf-eurad
Fulltext Access
Document TypeConference paper
Faculty of Science and Technology
Affiliation1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China
2.Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, Portugal
First Author AffilicationUniversity of Macau
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Hoi, K.I.,Yuen, K.V.,Mok, K.M.,et al. Comparison of the offline and the online bias correction of the WRF-EURAD in Porto, Portugal[C],2016.
APA Hoi, K.I.,Yuen, K.V.,Mok, K.M.,Miranda, A.I.,&Ribeiro, I..(2016).Comparison of the offline and the online bias correction of the WRF-EURAD in Porto, Portugal.8th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software,56.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Hoi, K.I.]'s Articles
[Yuen, K.V.]'s Articles
[Mok, K.M.]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Hoi, K.I.]'s Articles
[Yuen, K.V.]'s Articles
[Mok, K.M.]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Hoi, K.I.]'s Articles
[Yuen, K.V.]'s Articles
[Mok, K.M.]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.